Post-legitimacy and post-legitimisation: a convergence of Western and non-Western intervention
In: Conflict, security & development: CSD, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 251-255
ISSN: 1478-1174
51 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Conflict, security & development: CSD, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 251-255
ISSN: 1478-1174
In: Building Sustainable Peace, S. 15-31
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 443-461
ISSN: 1942-6720
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 311-312
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 102, Heft 2, S. 208-209
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Band 19, Heft 3
ISSN: 2468-0958, 1075-2846
Based on fieldwork interviews, this article examines the internationally sponsored good governance reforms in Georgia in the wake of the 2003 Rose Revolution. In one reading, the consolidation of power around the president can be seen as a failure of the good governance agenda. The article argues, however, that rather than using the success/failure binary to judge Georgia, it can be seen as a hybrid political order. Using an adapted four-part model of hybridization, the article examines the complex mix of international, local, and transnational dynamics that combine to produce hybrid governance. Adapted from the source document.
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 102, Heft 3, S. 311-312
ISSN: 0035-8533
In: Peace & change: PC ; a journal of peace research, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 477-479
ISSN: 1468-0130
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 101, Heft 3, S. 281-282
ISSN: 1474-029X
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 47, Heft 3, S. 287-308
ISSN: 1460-3691
This article seeks to unpack the implications of technocracy for contemporary peace-building. It aims to illustrate how the bureaucratic imperative explains much about the ascendancy of certain actors to positions of prominence on the peace-building landscape, and the types of activities that these actors engage in. In line with world polity theory, it is interested in the construction and institutionalization of discourses, understandings, expectations and practices of peace-building. It argues that there has been a 'technocratic turn' in relation to peace-building, whereby there has been a gradual but persistent trend towards the application of technocracy in the framing of conflict and approaches to it. Two key claims advanced on behalf of technocracy – neutrality and efficiency – are discussed. The article then argues that a complex mix of structural and proximate factors have reinforced the technocratic turn in peace-building. It concludes by considering the extent to which the discursive framing of conflict by key actors predetermines their conflict response. The article is primarily an exercise in conceptual scoping, though it can also be read as a contribution to the critique of the liberal peace and considerations of resistance and agency in peace-building contexts.
In: The round table: the Commonwealth journal of international affairs, Band 101, Heft 6, S. 596-597
ISSN: 0035-8533
In: Peace & change: a journal of peace research, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 477-480
ISSN: 0149-0508
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 47, Heft 3, S. 287-309
ISSN: 0010-8367
In: International peacekeeping, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 492-493
ISSN: 1353-3312
In: Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding, S. 347-366